|
Action among Frontiersmen in the
1866 War
When during the Polish uprising
the plans to mobilize the Military March in an insurrection
against Turkey and war against Austria broke down, and after
Austria smashed the network of secret agents and committees set
up by Oreskovic, Serbia had very few contacts with the Krajina
and the frontiersmen in the period between the end of 1864 and
the spring of 1866. In August 1866, Oreskovic informed General
Türr that, because of Italy's failure in 1864 to enter into an
agreement with Serbia, adopt its war plan and aid the
frontiersmen, he was forced to break off all his links in the
Krajina or reduce them to essential contacts. Serbia had very
poor relations with the Military Frontier in 1866, when the war
broke out between Austria on the one side, and Italy and Prussia
on the other. The government of Italy, with Prime Minister
General La Marmora, did not want to undertake any revolutionary
methods in its struggle for liberation and unification. For this
reason, it avoided contacts with the Garibaldians, the Hungarian
emigrés, and Serbia, which could have easily set the Frontier
alight. But what the government of Italy failed to do was
attempted by the Hungarian general Türr and the Italian consul
Scovasso. They both believed that war against Austria should be
conducted in conjunction with guerrilla actions in the Danube
basin, which implied the insurrection of the Military Frontier
and the landing of volunteers in Dalmatia. Anxious to do
something, Türr requested Oreskovic in April 1866 to inform him
whether it was possible to renew the earlier planned action among
the frontiersmen. Impressed by the mobilization which Austria
began on April 27, when it also started moving units from the
Military Frontier toward the Italian borders, the secretary
general of the Italian ministry of foreign affairs, Marcello
Cerruti, asked Consul Scovasso to find out whether the Serbian
government could in some way prevent the transfer of frontiersmen
in the direction of Italy. Although convinced that Italy was late
with this request, because some of the frontier units were
already close to its territories, Scovasso hoped that Garasanin
would be able to do something. Garasanin promised to do his best,
but because of Italy's unexplained and one-sided break in
cooperation with Serbia, contacts in the Military Frontiers had
been severed, and it was difficult to renew them in a hurry.
Scovasso started working out a plan with Oreskovic to synchronize
the uprising in the Military Frontier with the landing in
Dalmatia. However, the Italian consul's activity in Belgrade was
stopped when his superiors in Turin asked him "to inform
Prince Mihailo and Garasanin that the Italian government
absolutely does not wish anything to be undertaken against the
Turkish areas," but that otherwise it was ready "to do
everything possible to prevent the remaining troops in the
Military Frontier from joining the Austrian army." This was
a clear sign that Italy, like Kvaternik in 1866, did not want the
Eastern Question opened. Garasanin on his part thought that the
only way to stop the remaining frontiersmen from going to war
against Italy was to direct them to Bosnia. He did see the
possibility of the Military Frontier's participation in a war
against Austria in the event of an uprising, but only if a
revolution was staged in Hungary. Since no agreement was
achieved, the Serbian government decided to stay aloof during the
Italo-Prussian war against Austria. When Consul Scovasso realized
that Serbia was not going to take part in a war in which the
Italians and Hungarian emigrés demanded only sacrifices from her
but offered no benefits, he noted in one of his reports:
"Serbia will remain peaceful... and Turkey will guard the
Austrian Military Frontier."62
Why Serbia in 1866 did not get
involved in the war is due to the fact that Belgrade doubted that
France would take up arms in a war against Austria, and it had
more esteem for the power of its northern neighbour than for the
military might of Prussia and Italy. Moreover, Serbia stood on
the sidelines because Russia told her to stay put,63
but also because militarily she was not yet ready for war.
Very active among the
frontiersmen on the Croatian side was Imbro Ignjatijevic Tkalac.
As a political emigré he was then an official in the Italian
ministry of foreign affairs. He maintained a close rapport with
the leader of Hungarian emigrés, Lajos Kossuth. By arrangement
with him and Cerruti, Tkalac went to Paris in mid-May 1866, where
he was expected to write proclamations and political tracts to
dissuade the frontiersmen from fighting against Italy and
Prussia, to help start a revolution in the Military Frontier and
Croatia, to help overthrow the Habsburgs and promote
understanding between the Croats and Hungarians. Emperor Napoleon
did not go along with this undertaking, because he did not expect
much from either the Hungarians or the Slavs from Austria.64
But Prince Gérome Napoleon supported Tkalac's anti-Austrian
policy in the Military Frontier and Croatia. When Tkalac informed
him of having written the pamphlet, The Austrian Question: Who
Is to Resolve It, How, and When? A Letter to Brother Croats and
Serbs, the prince encouraged him to continue his work and
told him: "Work, act, create."65 In the
estimation of Tkalac, expressed in a letter to Kossuth, this
"pamphlet, written in the Croatian or, if you prefer, the
Serbian language - with the energy of my style, forcefulness,
logic, and clarity, simply calls upon Croatia to liberate itself
from Austria, to recall the army from the frontier to jointly
fight with Hungary, to suspend the negotiations in Budapest which
are poisoned with Austrian intrigues,66 to fight until
the establishment of freedom in the common country."67
Tkalac and his pamphlet described the Military Frontier as a
studfarm, in which "children are sired only for the
Emperor's army." He called for Austria's destruction and
pointed out that for both the Croats and Serbs "revolution
is the only salvation." Addressing himself to the
frontiersmen, Tkalac wrote: "I am talking to you, the
Serbian and Croatian soldier, to you, poor wretch, who have been
told since your childhood that you have no other duty in the
world than to obey the Emperor and imperial commanders, I am
talking to you, whose nationality, freedom, and every human right
have been taken away! The Serbs and the Croats have no business
in this war."
A genuine and sincere Yugoslav,
possibly the greatest and the most devoted Yugoslav of the 19th
century not only among the Croats but also among the Serbs,
Tkalac in all his public utterances always took into account both
Croatian and Serbian national interests. He was free from any
national selfishness and bigotry, which were a feature of many of
his contemporaries, both on the Croatian and on the Serbian side.
He made no distinction whatever between the national, political,
and state interests of the Serbs and Croats. He raised his voice
against Serbian as well as Croatian hegemony, and demanded of
both the Serbs and Croats that they "join together on the
basis of equal and identical rights and duties and put themselves
at the head of all other (South Slav) peoples and fight against
the common enemy until a common freedom for all has been
achieved."
Tkalac's pamphlet The
Austrian Question was dedicated not only to the Croatian and
Serbian frontiersmen but also, according to its author, "to
all those who can read and want to learn about the possibility,
need, chances and consequences of the revolution." The
pocket-size pamphlet contained about as many words as a Paris
newspaper. It was planned to be printed in 10,000 copies, of
which 2,000 were to be distributed to the frontiersmen at the
fronts in Bohemia and Venice, 2,000 to the Serbian population in
southern Hungary, 1,500 in Croatia, 500 in Dalmatia, and 2,000 in
the Croatian and Hungarian parts of the Military Frontier.68
Because of limited funds, the pamphlet was printed in far smaller
numbers than was planned, and many of its copies intended for
Southern Slav areas under Austria did not reach their readers.
The ship transporting these copies across the Adriatic sank,69
and Tkalac's pamphlet did not play the role which was intended
for it. Only those copies arrived in Croatia, southern Hungary
and Bohemia which Tkalac personally sent to individual
addressees, via Constantinople and Belgrade.70
In the second half of June,
1866, Tkalac wrote a proclamation to the frontiersmen. In its
introductory part he reminded the Serbian and Croatian soldiers
of Francis Joseph's war manifesto, in which he called upon them
to defend the rights of the Emperor and German princes, his
allies, against Prussia and Italy. He explained that this right
was nothing more than Austria's desire to prevent the creation of
a large German national state, to prevent liberal reforms among
the German people, and to make use of the frontiersmen, other
Slavs, and Hungarians. Tkalac warned the frontiersmen that
internecine German squabbles did not concern them at all; the
danger was in the fact that with the strength of their arms they
could help Austria overcome Prussia, and that the Monarchy, thus
strengthened, would stifle the nationality and freedom of all its
non-German peoples.
As regards the imperial right
over Italy, Tkalac identified it as Austria's intention to
maintain by brute force its authority in Venice, although the
latter wanted to be united with Italy, in which it was backed by
the entire Italian nation. Invoking his imperial right, Tkalac
explained to the frontiersmen, the emperor "ordered you to
leave your homeland and your homes, your wives and your children,
and to shed your blood for a cause which concerns you not in the
least and in relation to which, every one of your personal,
political and national interests is completely contrary to the
Emperor's interest. Until such time as Prussia creates a unified
state of Germany under its sceptre and Austria is forced to
withdraw from Germany, your blood will always be shed for the
ambitions of the Habsburg dynasty, and your nationhood will be
suffocated by the Austrian Germans, who regard themselves as your
masters, because Austria wants to proclaim itself as the only
German power. For as long as Venice and the Italian Tyrol remain
under the Austrian yoke, and until the unification of Italy is
completed so that the Austrian emperor is forced to abandon any
hope of reconquering Lombardy, Tuscany, and Modena, you will
never enjoy peace and rest in your homes, and you will always be
forced to fight for his ambitions. In other words, your interest
is that Germany and Italy be constituted as military states,
without Austria intervening in their national and political
affairs: this is exactly contrary to what the Emperor wants you
to fight for in the field."
The proclamation went on to say:
"What possible reason can you have to fight the Italians and
Prussians, who have no quarrel with you, just as you have none
with them, and who are only the Emperor's enemies, but not yours
as well. Your enemy, the only enemy you have, is Austria, and you
must fight the Austrian emperor to shake off the yoke which is as
undignified as it is intolerable. It is not for you to fight
against Prussia and Italy, and you can only stay on the sidelines
as disinterested observers. Let the Austrian Emperor and his
faithful allies, the German princes, fight for his ambition and
his interests: it is their cause and not at all yours. Your life,
your blood, your strength belong to your own homeland, to your
people and not to the Austrian Emperor or to German princes, and
God behooves you to commit them only for the defence of your
country and your freedom. Austria has forced you to take part in
the crimes which it is continuing to commit against what is most
sacred to all peoples: against their nationality and their
freedom. Austria's policy has besmirched the erstwhile respected
and glorious name of Croats and Serbs and made it to be the most
detestable curse among all European peoples." Tkalac then
called upon the frontiersmen to disobey their officers en
masse, thereby showing loyalty to their motherland and to
their nation. He assured them that their "noble
example" would soon be followed by the Hungarians and by
other Slavs. He asked them to surrender under a white flag to the
Italians and Prussians, and told them that they were not expected
to turn their weapons against the army which they had deserted.
However, Tkalac emphasized, after surrendering to the Italians or
Prussians, the frontiersmen must maintain discipline and order.
He instructed them to select from among their officers' ranks the
most competent and reliable men as commanders, who would
immediately send them back home and place them at their country's
disposal. Tkalac's plan was to send all the frontiersmen who had
surrendered to the Italians or Prussians into a war against
Turkey for the liberation of Bosnia and Hercegovina. He ended the
proclamation with the following words: "The hour of your
freedom will strike before you expect it and our motherland will
need your forces and your gallantry to regain its freedom and to
free your unhappy brothers in Bosnia and Hercegovina from the
Turkish yoke under which they are groaning. You wretched
soldier of the Frontier, who since your childhood have been told
that you have no country and no duty other than a slavish
obedience to the Emperor; you, whom the Austrian policy has
deprived of his motherland, nationality, freedom, and every human
right, making you blind to its sinister plans, here is your true
goal: take advantage of the military training which the Austrian
policy has given you, hoping to make you their weapon against the
freedom of all peoples; make use of it in order to prove your
valour in a just and legitimate war, in the imminent war for the
freedom of our motherland, and the happy generations to come will
bless your memory!"
The proclamation was printed in
octavo. The plan was to publish it in 10,000 copies, one half to
be sent to the Prusso-Austrian, and the other half to the
Italo-Austrian front.72 However, because of
difficulties in distribution and insufficient funds, only 5,000
copies were printed. Since the typesetters in Paris did not know
a word of a Slav language, the printing of the proclamation and
the pamphlet took a very long time, for Tkalac, by nature very
meticulous, did not want to permit his text to contain any
printing errors. Furthermore, there were some misunderstandings
between him and Kossuth about the contents of the pamphlet.73
All this slowed down the job so that the pamphlet and the
proclamation appeared with a delay, after the war was already
finished.74 Tkalac claimed that his efforts to raise
the frontiersmen and foment the revolution failed because they
were "overtaken by the lightning victories of the Prussian
army." Tkalac also found reason for his failure in the
"stupidities of the Italian and Hungarian politicians, who
acted contrary to their duty." He believed that the war of
1866 was a great opportunity lost. He doubted that another would
soon present itself, but comforted himself with the hope that
everything could be resolved with the Eastern Question. If the
Eastern Question is properly dealt with, Tkalac wrote, "it
may give us an opportunity to get back to our actions. As long as
this chance remains, I shall not lose hope; but if we do not take
advantage of it, we might as well bury ourselves alive. I shall
do whatever I can, if only to still my conscience."75
Although the Military Frontier
after 1866 was frequently the object of national political and
liberatory plans of the Serbs and Croats, Tkalac no longer took
interest in them. Once he lost the status of political emigré
and became a naturalized Italian and a civil servant, he could
not involve himself in political schemes such as those of 1866,
not even to still his conscience. However, his 1866 action
deserves special attention because he was the first among the
Croats and Serbs to attempt to use the might of the Military
Frontier for their common rather than separate national
interests. In this respect, he was ahead even of the Serbian
government led by Garasanin and the National Party under
Strossmayer, who understood only after the war's end that their
national political plans and goals must be coordinated, failing
which there would be no success.
|